|
To: "Ron Angus" <a.p.e.judo@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Sub floor
|
![[]](198ada6.jpg)
I don't really have a good feel if reducing
the thickness would be better or worse?
Beyond the fact that if you leave the rest of the design the same... the block
spacing, the osb plywood thickness, etc the same and only change the foam
thickness, cutting the thickness in half will cut the deformation under load
in half.
I think this would make a STIFFER FEELING floor system. How much? I don't
know?...
If we look at the load on our floor system for loading:
Plywood
Mats
Players
So
Block
load per block
Block area
So at 3x4:
My floor is 3x4x4 blocks and 3x4 is foot print ie block is 3x4 glued to
plywood (osb) my plan was to be 3 inch high and not 4 inch (gnomes!
again)
Chart says
If you use 2 inch high
10% of 2 inches is 0.2 inch at 7psi
25% of 2 inches is 0.5 inch at 9 psi
if you use 4 inch high
10% of 4 inch is 0.4 inch at 7 psi
25% of 4 inch is 1.0 inch at 9 psi
Wild guess is we probably see .5 to 1.0 inch deflection in a block (floor
assembly) at time of fall not
counting the tatami deformation... Denver Dojo is a
pretty comfortable mat surface without springy-bounce feel to it.
If I were to build another I would stick with the 4 inch height. I might go
to 3 inch for a cost savings. I would even try 3x3x3 blocks!
Ron - Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Jim
At 08:49 AM 10/5/2006, you wrote:
Hi James sorry to bother you again about this dam sub floor but I have done some tests and I am leaning towards 4x4x2 (2 being the height ) cubes . I fear that 4 inches may make the mat too springy . and be moving while others are training near by , plus it have the cost . Where did you find the height of 4 inches and what are your thoughts of 2 inches ?. Since you may or may not know you are quickly becoming the judo sub floor exasperate of north America